Hello All,
I need to implement user response function with the following scenario :
Start Date : 1st Day of the previous month i.e 01-Nov-2015
End Date : Last day of the previous month i.e 30-Nov-2015
How to implement?
Sandy R
Hello All,
I need to implement user response function with the following scenario :
Start Date : 1st Day of the previous month i.e 01-Nov-2015
End Date : Last day of the previous month i.e 30-Nov-2015
How to implement?
Sandy R
I tried to get the Cascading Query from WebI reports version 3.1 (see the below code for reference) but this code is not fetching all queries.
SQLDataProvider sqldp;
SQLContainer sqlcntr = null;
int containerCnt = 0;
SQLNode sqlnode = null;
SQLSelectStatement SqlSel = null;
String sqlStatement = null;
if (dp instanceof SQLDataProvider)
{
sqldp = (SQLDataProvider) dp;
if (sqldp.isCustomSQL())
{
sqlcntr = sqldp.getSQLContainer();
// sqlcntr = sqldp.getSQLContainer(false);
if (sqlcntr != null )
{
//containerCnt = sqlcntr.getChildCount();
sqlnode = (SQLNode) sqlcntr.getChildAt(0);
SqlSel = (SQLSelectStatement) sqlnode;
sqlStatement = SqlSel.getSQL();
}
}
}
I also tried with "getSQLContainer(false)" but it fails to provide DataProvider. Suggest any way to get the Cascading queries.
Can someone please suggest a method to calculate number of days using quarter and year values? Or on the other hand can we generate the 1st or last day of the quarter using the year and quarter values
The requirement is as follows:
Year | Quarter | No of Days |
---|---|---|
2015 | 1 | 90 |
2015 | 2 | 91 |
2015 | 3 | ?? |
2015 | 4 | ?? |
HI ,
I have seen several posts and as well as googled i didnt get any proper info . i have been trying from my end when i click on report go and apply for hyper link and documents . same tab opening like Link to document and link to web page , i am wondering what is the differnce between them if no why they have added 2 options
Any help much appreciated
Thanks
Hello,
I am facing the same issue as described in this KBA : 2218804.
I am already on BI 4.1 SP6 patch 5 however the problem is the same!
The palette color is always incorrect when using both default or customised ones.
Any idea please?
Thanks a lot!
Asma
Hi all,
When I open any BI 4.1 (SP3) Webi report the 'Document Summary' panel on the left of the report always opens maximised. How can we get get a webi report to open with the 'Document Summary' panel open in a minimized state?
Thanks,
Chris
Hi,
How can I sort on my desired column in webi while in reading mode.
Is it possible? or any workarounds?
Thanks
Seshu.
Hi Expert Team,
We have webi report in BI4.1 , Please refer below input data, we want our output data either in case1 form or case2 form. Overall we do not want Cost amount to get repeated or gets duplicated.
Can you please suggest how to achieve the same.
Let me know any more inputs is needed.
INPUT DATA:
Order | Sales No. | Order Date | Cost |
123 | 10 | 19-12-2015 1:12:00 | 100 |
123 | 20 | 19-12-2015 1:12:00 | 100 |
ABC123 | 30 | 20-12-2015 1:12:00 | 200 |
ABC123 | 40 | 20-12-2015 1:12:00 | 200 |
EFG456 | 50 | 20-12-2015 1:12:00 | 300 |
EFG456 | 60 | 20-12-2015 1:12:00 | 300 |
EXPECTED Output Case 1:
Order | Sales No | Order Date | Cost |
123 | 10 | 19-12-2015 1:12:00 | 100 |
ABC123 | 30 | 20-12-2015 1:12:00 | 200 |
EFG456 | 50 | 20-12-2015 1:12:00 | 300 |
EXPECTED Output Case 2:
Order | Sales No | Order Date | Cost |
123 | 20 | 19-12-2015 1:12:00 | 100 |
ABC123 | 40 | 20-12-2015 1:12:00 | 200 |
EFG456 | 60 | 20-12-2015 1:12:00 | 300 |
Expecting your reply at earliest.
Thanks & Br
Bansi
Dear All,
1) I have the BI Launch pad link & CMC link(URL), when i entered in the browser we will get the home pages for individual links right.
Here i would like to know in the backend servers which are activated (running) for BI Launch Pad and for CMC?
2) I have open the report on BI Launch Pad & refresh the report tell me what are the servers are working beyond that?
Regards,
Boya
Dear All,
How many functions are available in Universe designing UDT/IDT & Web intelligence reports, like "No Filter, @prompt, @variable,...." please explain me the functions with at least one example?
And also help me on errors like "in compatible , #Multivalue, #syntax, #context, ..."?
Regards,
Boya
Hi Folks,
We are facing an issue with the WEBI report based on the multi-sourced
universe.
Environment - BO 4.1 SP5
Data source - 2 Oracle 11.2 sources
When we select the prompt values and refresh the report it throws the
error as
Database error: [Data Federator Driver]
Cannot Reach Server. Reason: attempt to establish connection failed:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect. (IES10901)
(Error: INF)
rgds,
Prakash S
Hello,
I have two queries. Query 1 contains several dimensions and measures, with date being one of the dimensions. Query 2 gives me a single dynamic date.
Using the results from Query 1 as a table, I need to add an IF variable that compares the date in each record to the single dynamic date from Query 2.
So if Query 2 gave me 12/1/2015, and my results have several dates before and after, I just need a binary identifier to tell me which records have a greater date.
I cannot feed the dynamic date as a filter, because I need historic dates for comparison reasons.
I also don't think I can/should merge on anything, as there are no common fields other than date.
Is there a syntax I can use to make the single date stand on its own? Or perhaps a way I can tell my IF variable to look at the value from a separate table? Any other way to do this without editing the SQL?
I appreciate any help!!!
Hello Gurus,
I've a requirement to show top N rows in a table, but that N is a dynamic which is derived by ranking on 2 different measures. So eventually, we show some rows by ranking on Total and some rows by ranking on Measure 1. (Total = Measure 1 + Measure 2). For some reason I couldn't attach Excel, so attaching the data tables here.
I am able to implement the logic for Case 1 by using multiple variables, but the problem is that I need to show rows according to Case 1 or Case 2 in the same table.
Case 1: I need to show Top 10 (having Total >= 25,000) and if I have 10 such Names, then I can show upto 3 more Names which have M1 >= 10,000. I can show no more than 13 Names in this case.
Case 1 | |||
Amt in K (thousands) | |||
Name | Total (M1+M2) | M1 | M2 |
A01 | 210,000 | 0 | 210,000 |
A02 | 186,000 | 0 | 186,000 |
A03 | 97,000 | 36,000 | 61,000 |
A04 | 85,000 | 0 | 85,000 |
A05 | 76,400 | 1,400 | 75,000 |
A06 | 62,840 | 840 | 62,000 |
A07 | 59,000 | 32,000 | 27,000 |
A08 | 53,000 | 0 | 53,000 |
A09 | 46,000 | 66,000 | (20,000) |
A10 | 44,000 | 0 | 44,000 |
A11 | 43,000 | 0 | 43,000 |
A12 | 33,000 | 43,000 | (10,000) |
A13 | 25,000 | 15,000 | 10,000 |
A14 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 0 |
A15 | 6,000 | 5,000 | 1,000 |
A16 | 7,000 | 6,000 | 1,000 |
A17 | 6,400 | 2,400 | 4,000 |
A18 | 2,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
A19 | 200 | 200 | 0 |
A20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A29 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Logic needed for Case 1: I need to show Top 10 (having Total >= 25,000) and if I have 10 such Names, then I can show upto 3 more Names which have M1 >= 10,000. I can show no more than 13 Names in this case. | |||
Top 10 based on Total | |||
Top 3 based on M1 (excludes top 10 based on Total) | |||
Note: As I mentioned in previous bullet, these are not included in top 3 based on M1, because these rows are already included in top 10 based on Total. |
Result from Case 1 | |||
Name | Total (M1+M2) | M1 | M2 |
A01 | 210,000 | 0 | 210,000 |
A02 | 186,000 | 0 | 186,000 |
A03 | 97,000 | 36,000 | 61,000 |
A04 | 85,000 | 0 | 85,000 |
A05 | 76,400 | 1,400 | 75,000 |
A06 | 62,840 | 840 | 62,000 |
A07 | 59,000 | 32,000 | 27,000 |
A08 | 53,000 | 0 | 53,000 |
A09 | 46,000 | 66,000 | (20,000) |
A10 | 44,000 | 0 | 44,000 |
A12 | 33,000 | 43,000 | (10,000) |
A13 | 25,000 | 15,000 | 10,000 |
A14 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 0 |
Case 2: Using the first part of logic in Case 1, if we see that out of Top 10 for Total, we only have 5 Names (with Total more than 25,000), then apart from them, I want to show upto 5 more Names which have M1 >= 5,000. I can show no more than 10 Names in this case.
That means: If only 7 Names have Total >= 25,000, then I can show 3 Names that have M1 >= 5000 or
If only 6 Names have Total >= 25,000, then I can show 4 Names that have M1 >= 5000... and so on.
Case 2 | ||||
Amt in K (thousands) | ||||
Name | Total (M1+M2) | M1 | M2 | |
A01 | 210,000 | 0 | 210,000 | |
A02 | 186,000 | 0 | 186,000 | |
A03 | 97,000 | 36,000 | 61,000 | |
A04 | 85,000 | 0 | 85,000 | |
A05 | 82,000 | 10,000 | 72,000 | |
A06 | 23,840 | 840 | 23,000 | |
A07 | 23,000 | 0 | 23,000 | |
A08 | 2,000 | 12,000 | (10,000) | |
A09 | 10,000 | 8,000 | 2,000 | |
A10 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 0 | |
A11 | 6,000 | 5,000 | 1,000 | |
A12 | 7,000 | 6,000 | 1,000 | |
A13 | 6,400 | 2,400 | 4,000 | |
A14 | 2,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | |
A15 | 200 | 200 | 0 | |
A16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Logic for Case 2: Using the first part of logic in Case 1, if we see that out of Top 10 for Total, we only have 5 Names (with Total more than 25,000), then apart from them, I want to show upto 5 more Names which have M1 >= 5,000. I can show no more than 10 Names in this case. | ||||
Top N (5 in this case) based on Total | ||||
Top N (5 in this case) based on M1 (excludes top 10 based on Total) | ||||
Note: As I mentioned in previous bullet, these are not included in top N based on M1, because these rows are already included in top N based on Total. |
Result from Case 2 | |||
Name | Total (M1+M2) | M1 | M2 |
A01 | 210,000 | 0 | 210,000 |
A02 | 186,000 | 0 | 186,000 |
A03 | 97,000 | 36,000 | 61,000 |
A04 | 85,000 | 0 | 85,000 |
A05 | 76,400 | 1,400 | 75,000 |
A08 | 2,000 | 12,000 | (10,000) |
A09 | 10,000 | 8,000 | 2,000 |
A10 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 0 |
A11 | 6,000 | 5,000 | 1,000 |
A12 | 7,000 | 6,000 | 1,000 |
I am able to implement the logic for Case 1 by using multiple variables, but the problem is that I need to show rows according to Case 1 or Case 2 in the same table.
Existing Objects: [Name], [Total], [M1] and [M2]
Variables created:
Now, using the above variables, I can accomplish what I need in Case 1 by filtering on the table as [v_Total_Top10with25KPlus] = 1 or [v_M1_ToRank_Top3with10KPlus] = 1 and I'll get 13 rows (10 from ranking based on Total and 3 or less from ranking based on v_M1_ToRank). But what if not all the Top 10 based on Total has Total >= 25,000? I need to go to Case 2, and as you know in N in this case is X+Y (e.g. 9+1 or 8+2 or 7+3 or 6+4 so on till 1+9) where X is the Top N values based on Total having Total > 25,000 and Y is Top 10-X values based on v_M1_ToRank (>= 5000).
To get started with finding out what that X, Y can be, I created a formula that gives us X and we can derive Y a 10-X. Great, what do I do after that?
So, we now at least know, how many values are we showing by ranking based on Total and v_M1_RankingTopwith5KPlus. I need a brake now as my head is spinning and also your help with how to proceed.
Hope you'll got the question, any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Mahboob Mohammed
Hi All,
A previous developer had created a cross tab report with the following fields: Location, Department, Year, Month and Count of Accounts as seen in the attached Image (Crosstab_1)
I need to be able to combine the totals from the respective Department into the corresponding Location and Department.
As an example, Data from Location = All Cities for Apr, May and Jun from Department = ABC Grocery, DEF Clothing and XYZ Kitchenware should be added to Location = Los Angeles and the respective departments.
Similarly, data from ABC restaurant, JKH Clothing and LMO Kitchenware from All- Cities needs to be added to Location = New York and the corresponding departments.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
I have sales people that we metric on. They are in 3 groups, Team 1, Team 2, Team 3. Each of them can sell at either level. I am trying to combine that information into a table, then to a chart so I can count the total sales.
Example, John might have 20 sales on Team 1, 30 sales on Team 2, and 10 sales on Team 3. In the data source (BEX) the column header is the Team 1, 2, or 3.
I am trying to the table and chart to show that John had 50 sales total, but I am struggling on writing a formula that will take Johns counts on all three teams and give me a total.
Any suggestions?
Hello Experts,
There is a customer requirement to exclude only one of the child node out of many others while showing the data in WEBI Report. Please see the snapshot below. This is Member Selector snapshot from WEBI Query Panel.
The above snapshot shows the hierarchy. Is there any way to select Only Walgreen and exclude Tesco in WEBI? By Default, WEBI allows to select All or None of the child nodes.
I also tried the same in Analysis Office for MS Excel to see if it can be achieved in that and then Analysis view can be used as Source for WEBI, but the same is not allowed there as well.
Please suggest if there is any way.
Note: I know it can be achieved in Bex Query Designer using filters but customer has some standards which refrains from doing so.
Thanks & Regards,
Abhijit
Hi,
We have installed Bobj 4.1 in linux os.
For generating keystore file gave the below command in putty,
cd "/usr/BOBJ/sap_bobj/enterprise_xi40/java/lib" -jar PKCS12Tool.jar -alias mywin -storepass admin1 -dname CN=hostname
same way for exporting public key certificate,
"/usr/BOBJ/sap_bobj/enterprise_xi40/java/lib" -exportcert -keystore keystore.p12 -storetype pkcs12 -file cert.der -alias mywin
but keystore.p12 & cert.der file could not be found in this location"/usr/BOBJ/sap_bobj/enterprise_xi40/java/lib"
Is the commands are correct to run in linux ?
Please suggest solution
Thanks,
Sangavi V
Hi All,
Can anybody suggest how we can achieve running sum for the following scenario
Name | Accounts | Running Sum |
---|---|---|
Jan | 5 | 5 |
Feb | 7 | 12 |
Mar | 5 | 17 |
For the above data when I apply a filter for the 1st row, I would like to have the 1st row hidden based on certain conditions and still retain the running sum.
Name | Accounts | Running Sum |
---|---|---|
Feb | 7 | 12 |
mar | 5 | 17 |
To be more precise, I am trying to do a YTD calculation for a certain measure value but don't want the data to be displayed from the beginning of the year. Any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks in advance
Hi All,
i just created linked ITSM as per SBO41 universal design tool document and everything went well. i created and linked custom ITSM (linked ITSM) to existing OOTB ITSM.
i can see both ITSM in CMS
all connection servers are up and running.
I wanted to take reports from both universe now, ITSM and Linked_ITSM
i have no problem in taking reports from OOTB ITSM universe but,
when i try to login to linked_ITSM from WRC i get attached error
"No business layer sent back from server"
someone please let me know how to resolve this error, what could have gone wrong?
I'm using WRC 4.1 Sp1
BMC Analytics 8.1
SAP BO 4.1
Thanks
Zaheer